> I think most people dont meet in houses anymore. Even if that was true (no data offered), that's a choice, not some kind of economic inevitability... And ag

> I think most people dont meet in houses anymore. Even if that was true (no data offered), that's a choice, not some kind of economic inevitability... And again even if it was true, no it's not because of roommates, the number of people per household has gone down over time, not up, for decades. And no it's also not because we live in smaller homes, the average size of homes has gone up also, for decades. We now have about 2.5x more square footage per-person in our homes than 50 years ago. And we all know that are homes are way more equipped with entertainment than ever before (internet with the world's content at our fingertips, home cinema, home libraries, home music sets etc). As for the 600k FAANG, I've never earned more than 100k, never worked in tech, and grew up on welfare. I've been a bottom 10% of the economic ladder for about 80% of my life, and a top 10% (not top 0.1%) for about 20% of my life. Regardless of background, I think we can speak about facts borne out by the data.