Please take a moment and consider what exactly you responded to and how. I'm pointing you out specifically since you seem to be familiar with the concepts of go

Please take a moment and consider what exactly you responded to and how. I'm pointing you out specifically since you seem to be familiar with the concepts of good faith vs bad faith arguments. The post you responded to asked about a specific aspect, namely political power, of math PhDs. Your response was to state that surely other PhDs have bias in their work. Are you not realizing that that's quite obviously a bad faith argument? Somebody claims that A has B and your respond that C had D, insinuating GP made connections between A and D or C and B. They didn't. It's quite common to argue like that, but you did throw around the "bad faith" term. You need to measure your own behavior by that standard when accusing others.