4 ms·
Yes, the point wasn’t “Clojure rules, Haskell drools”, it’s that at a high enough level of abstraction, encoding business rules with static types is brittle. It
by cgh 1y ago
Yes, the point wasn’t “Clojure rules, Haskell drools”, it’s that at a high enough level of abstraction, encoding business rules with static types is brittle. It’s not some huge revelation; enterprises have done this for decades with SQL and gasp stored procedures.