4 ms·

Lambda Labs Debuts An API For Face Recognition

29 points by sinzone 14y ago

sabalaba 14y ago
http://api.lambdal.com http://api.lambdal.com the direct link
ZephyrP 14y ago
Cool. It may be true that Face.com's API is theirs, and they can do what they'd like with it - however, it's a little disconcerting to see a company say on one hand "We love our API developers and we intend to support you in the future" to shutting down their API with haste. I've already told my friends who relied on Face.com about this service, it's great to see someone saving startups the hassle of reimplementing functionality that will be complex and costly to solve in a fast-paced environment. I hope more services like this one proliferate in the future!
ariannahsimpson 14y ago
Nice work Stephen, looks like you guys have gotten a lot done since we talked @Stripe a few weeks ago. Congrats!
bravura 14y ago
Stephen, great to meet you at Langton Labs a few months ago. Glad to see that you solved this problem. I'm curious about your strategy of open-sourcing this. (In general, I'm curious about business models for ML.) Do you mind sharing your thoughts?
- sabalaba 14y ago
  We're talking with a few people who have more experience than us in managing open source projects, they'll be able to help us optimize it. Since it's a web API, we're venturing through unknown territory. I think it's probably going to look similar to something like Automattic as far as business model, where the techno-elite are always able to run their own install for free while those looking for more of a seamless 'hosted' experience, will pay.
mekarpeles 14y ago
I've been using lambda labs' face detect api for a few weeks now. The API calls essentially return the same structured JSON as face.com which has been a huge plus (considering I'm using this as a face.com replacement and I didn't have to change much code to get my old code up and running). Stephen (sabalaba) was nice enough to give me a sneak-peak of some of his team's upcoming facial recognition features. I can't speak to how the underlying algos compare to face.com's but their APIs have been accurate enough for my needs and they have some really cool ideas in development.
gcr 14y ago
If this really is "open source," as the TechCrunch article says, where's the source code for their face recognizer? As a computer vision researcher, I'm interested in seeing how it works. The only thing that's open source here is the client libraries. EDIT: I misread, looks like the lack of source code is a temporary issue: Lambda Labs co-founder Stephen Balaban ... explained to me that the company wanted to go the open source route, but planned to eventually monetize by charging larger customers for support, as is a standard practice for open source-based companies.
- sabalaba 14y ago
  Yea, we're talking with a few people who've done this before. Once we get the the license choice squared away, right now we're discussing MIT vs AGPL, we'll publicly launch the source. If you, or anybody else reading this, wants early access, send me an email s@lambdal.com.
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
- fferen 14y ago
  It looks like it's selecting from only 6 predefined celebrities (none of which are Stallman), so among those, Arnold matched best.
  - deleted 14y ago
    [deleted]
  - sabalaba 14y ago
    You can train your own album with an arbitrary number of people. And who's stallman? That's St IGNUcius of the Church of Emacs!
ansgri 14y ago
> Face.com was closed off, and didn’t share the details of how it operated. Not so true, at least they gave a talk outlining their methods (I remember they used single-point classification with very complex distance and 3D model fitting) as well as quality numbers (~95% recognition) at Yet Another Conference'2011 in Moscow.

29 points by sinzone 14y ago

http://api.lambdal.com http://api.lambdal.com the direct link

Cool. It may be true that Face.com's API is theirs, and they can do what they'd like with it - however, it's a little disconcerting to see a company say on one hand "We love our API developers and we intend to support you in the future" to shutting down their API with haste. I've already told my friends who relied on Face.com about this service, it's great to see someone saving startups the hassle of reimplementing functionality that will be complex and costly to solve in a fast-paced environment. I hope more services like this one proliferate in the future!

ariannahsimpson 14y ago

Nice work Stephen, looks like you guys have gotten a lot done since we talked @Stripe a few weeks ago. Congrats!

bravura 14y ago

Stephen, great to meet you at Langton Labs a few months ago. Glad to see that you solved this problem. I'm curious about your strategy of open-sourcing this. (In general, I'm curious about business models for ML.) Do you mind sharing your thoughts?

sabalaba 14y ago
We're talking with a few people who have more experience than us in managing open source projects, they'll be able to help us optimize it. Since it's a web API, we're venturing through unknown territory. I think it's probably going to look similar to something like Automattic as far as business model, where the techno-elite are always able to run their own install for free while those looking for more of a seamless 'hosted' experience, will pay.

mekarpeles 14y ago

I've been using lambda labs' face detect api for a few weeks now. The API calls essentially return the same structured JSON as face.com which has been a huge plus (considering I'm using this as a face.com replacement and I didn't have to change much code to get my old code up and running). Stephen (sabalaba) was nice enough to give me a sneak-peak of some of his team's upcoming facial recognition features. I can't speak to how the underlying algos compare to face.com's but their APIs have been accurate enough for my needs and they have some really cool ideas in development.

gcr 14y ago

If this really is "open source," as the TechCrunch article says, where's the source code for their face recognizer? As a computer vision researcher, I'm interested in seeing how it works. The only thing that's open source here is the client libraries. EDIT: I misread, looks like the lack of source code is a temporary issue: Lambda Labs co-founder Stephen Balaban ... explained to me that the company wanted to go the open source route, but planned to eventually monetize by charging larger customers for support, as is a standard practice for open source-based companies.

sabalaba 14y ago
Yea, we're talking with a few people who've done this before. Once we get the the license choice squared away, right now we're discussing MIT vs AGPL, we'll publicly launch the source. If you, or anybody else reading this, wants early access, send me an email s@lambdal.com.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

fferen 14y ago
It looks like it's selecting from only 6 predefined celebrities (none of which are Stallman), so among those, Arnold matched best.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
- sabalaba 14y ago
  You can train your own album with an arbitrary number of people. And who's stallman? That's St IGNUcius of the Church of Emacs!

ansgri 14y ago

> Face.com was closed off, and didn’t share the details of how it operated. Not so true, at least they gave a talk outlining their methods (I remember they used single-point classification with very complex distance and 3D model fitting) as well as quality numbers (~95% recognition) at Yet Another Conference'2011 in Moscow.