https://philarchive.org/archive/ELLWDC https://philarchive.org/archive/ELLWDC Why Delayed Choice Experiments do NOT imply Retrocausality David Ellerman Unive

https://philarchive.org/archive/ELLWDC https://philarchive.org/archive/ELLWDC Why Delayed Choice Experiments do NOT imply Retrocausality David Ellerman University of California/Riverside October 16, 2014 There is a fallacy that is often involved in the interpretation of quantum experiments involving a certain type of separation such as the: double-slit experiments, which-way interferometer experiments, polarization analyzer experiments, Stern-Gerlach experiments, and quantum eraser experiments. The fallacy leads not only to flawed textbook accounts of these experiments but to flawed inferences about retrocausality in the context of delayed choice versions of separation experiments.