2 ms·
So you would prefer something like the this: http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png It seems like poor UX to me. It's a little ugly how lin
by prophetjohn 14y ago
So you would prefer something like the this:
http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png
It seems like poor UX to me. It's a little ugly how line length isn't constrained and you're unable to do anything but type a query into the box. Special queries would require memorizing commands or just doing without.
- qu4z-2 14y agoI'd prefer a multi-column layout, 'cause you're right that long lines are hard to read. I don't use that many special queries, except sometimes "site:", and frankly if I have to type (or paste) the entire domain anyway, "site:" is way less effort than switching to a different text field, even if it were one of the defaults. I'd be OK having a "More Options" link or something for the rare case when I want to search for images by color or whatever. Having said that, I'm aware this is very much a personal opinion. Google can design their site for the majority. I don't mind.