2 ms·
These tools and LLMs differ in quality, for me Claude Code with Claude 4 was the first tool that worked well enough. I tried Cursor before, it's been a 6+ month
by msikora 1y ago
These tools and LLMs differ in quality, for me Claude Code with Claude 4 was the first tool that worked well enough. I tried Cursor before, it's been a 6+ months ago though, but I wasn't very impressed.
- brulard 1y agoSame for me. Cursor was a mess for me. I don't know why and how it works for other people. Claude code on the other hand was a success from day one and I'm using it happily for months now.
- adastra22 1y agoI used Cursor for about 5 months before switching to Claude Code. I was only productive with Cursor when I used it in a very specific way, which was basically me doing by hand what Claude Code does internally. I maintained planning documents, todo lists, used test driven development and linting tools, etc. My .cursorrules file looks like what I imagine the Claude system prompt to be. Claude Code took the burden of maintaining that off my shoulders. Also Cursor was/is utterly useless any all non-Anthropic models, which are the default.