Does this not make a double strawman? What's the point of that? For example, they might be of the opinion that danger doesn't increase linearly with speed, but

Does this not make a double strawman? What's the point of that? For example, they might be of the opinion that danger doesn't increase linearly with speed, but more aggressively. This would result in a scenario where they could argue for lower speed limits without having to argue for complete car elimination. Case in point, this piece of news.