3 ms·
I do. Well, except perhaps my query at the top so I can refine it if necessary.
by qu4z-2 14y ago
I do.
Well, except perhaps my query at the top so I can refine it if necessary.
- calciphus 14y agoSo turn on adblock or get one of the scripts that strips down the UI. Mountains of testing have shown that you're in the severe minority here.
- qu4z-2 14y agoI do use scripts for that. I was just providing a counter point to the parent's "No one wants". "Most people don't want" would be more accurate.
- prophetjohn 14y agoSo you would prefer something like the this: http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png http://i.imgur.com/ryiPq.png It seems like poor UX to me. It's a little ugly how line length isn't constrained and you're unable to do anything but type a query into the box. Special queries would require memorizing commands or just doing without.
- qu4z-2 14y agoI'd prefer a multi-column layout, 'cause you're right that long lines are hard to read. I don't use that many special queries, except sometimes "site:", and frankly if I have to type (or paste) the entire domain anyway, "site:" is way less effort than switching to a different text field, even if it were one of the defaults. I'd be OK having a "More Options" link or something for the rare case when I want to search for images by color or whatever. Having said that, I'm aware this is very much a personal opinion. Google can design their site for the majority. I don't mind.
- sologoub 14y agoI kinda like the collapsable sidebar present in Google Maps. However, I rarely miss the extra space taken up by the current sidebar on the main search results page.