3 ms·
> as long as they know they are talking to a model Any evidence for this? It's obvious that a sufficiently advanced AI could solve loneliness if it was allowe
by miki123211 1y ago
> as long as they know they are talking to a model
Any evidence for this?
It's obvious that a sufficiently advanced AI could solve loneliness if it was allowed to present as human, you just wouldn't know it isn't one. I'm entirely unconvinced that something which seems human in all respects couldn't replace one, even if your brain knows that it's actually AI.
- mensetmanusman 1y agoA sufficiently advanced ai that tricks humans would be a human life itself…
- aradox66 1y agocaught in the wild, the moving goalposts of the Turing test
- bflesch 1y agoone day, some sick mind will do a study with a baby who is only exposed to AI without any real human contact
- OldfieldFund 1y agoand will find out that the outcome is better than mean (if it includes cuddling and stuff)
- achierius 1y agoWanna bet?
- salemh 1y ago[dead]
- augzodia 1y agoTed Chiang (sci fi author: Exhalation, Stories of Your Life - basis for Arrival) has a short story about this. Darcy’s Patent Automatic Nanny
- jowea 1y agoRather unethical experiment for interstellar colonization mission planning.
- bravesoul2 1y agoThere is no basis to believe that.
- akimbostrawman 1y agoConvincing someone of something doesn't make it true or real.
- MangoToupe 1y ago> It's obvious that a sufficiently advanced AI could solve loneliness if it was allowed to present as human What does this even look like? Are you suggesting using a human surrogate?
- const_cast 1y ago> It's obvious that a sufficiently advanced AI could solve loneliness if it was allowed to present as human, you just wouldn't know it isn't one. How is this obvious? How? Because you saw the movie Ex Machina?