32 ms·
The author of the article appears to think that Oppenheimer's intellectual contributions were superior to those of the "AI" implementers. If you analyze in pur
by bgwalter 1y ago
The author of the article appears to think that Oppenheimer's intellectual contributions were superior to those of the "AI" implementers.
If you analyze in purely capitalistic terms: Yes, being an uncreative middleman who steals what other people have created has always paid far better than being a scientist.