3 ms·
Not the previous poster - but the study which confirms that remote work is not bad, was one done at Stanford. The devil in the details was that Hybrid resulted
by intended 1y ago
Not the previous poster - but the study which confirms that remote work is not bad, was one done at Stanford. The devil in the details was that Hybrid resulted in productivity gains - not remote.
- hn_throwaway_99 1y agoDo you have a link to that, I'd be interested to see their methodology. That confirms my experience. Even before the pandemic, I would often work from home one or two days a week when I needed to be in "heads down" mode and just knock shit out. It was more efficient for me because there were fewer distractions and it was easier for me to get in the zone. But then I still had plenty of time for in-person collaboration with my colleagues.
- intended 1y agoUgh. I feel bad sharing this, because I am a proponent of Remote. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/06/hybrid-work-is-a-win-win-win-for-companies-workers https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/06/hybrid-work-is-a-w... this should have a link. Also a correction - it showed increased retention rates, but no change in productivity.