3 ms·

The title doesn't say nor imply anything about her getting it back though? It says her assets were seized which is correct.

• peeters 1y ago
  The article itself has the title: > The FBI Seized Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back Against That Practice—and Lost I think it's decent, but still a bit ambiguous. Less ambiguous than if it just said "She Fought Back and Lost". My initial assumption formed by the title was still that she didn't get her money back.
  • Etheryte 1y ago
    The submission title is "FBI seized $40k from Linda Martin without charging her with a crime" which doesn't have that issue.
    • JohnMakin 1y ago
      It was not that originally.