This line, fairly early in the article, sounds like BS. If not BS, then it is poor writing, because it hand-waves over a huge chasm: "Using correlative analysi

This line, fairly early in the article, sounds like BS. If not BS, then it is poor writing, because it hand-waves over a huge chasm: "Using correlative analysis, Wilson confirmed that the rats were dreaming of their maze navigating exploits from the day before." They absolutely confirmed the rats were dreaming specifically of the mazes of the day before, by analyzing their neural activity? If so, that technology is FAR more interesting than merely controlling their dreams!