4 ms·
> Background: UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, "by acting with deliberate ind
by lupusreal 1y ago
> Background: UCLA violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, "by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students."
Translation: ULCA declined to violate the First Ammendment and allowed their students and faculty to criticize Israel.
- mensetmanusman 1y agoIt’s more akin to the civil rights movement/counter movement when some universities ignored various assaults on black students (saying it wasn’t their job to police behavior). The protesters were fine to criticize Israel, but then turning the rage to the actual American Jews on campus crossed the line.
- DSingularity 1y agoProvide evidence from reputable sources. Israeli Jews kill tens of thousands of Palestinian children and we are supposed to care that Zionists feel targeted by the protests on campus? Zionists are literally starving people right now. Do you not get that?
- nrclark 1y agoThere's a distinction to make between Jewish people and Israel. Jewish people are fine. The Israeli genocide of Gaza is not.
- peterfirefly 1y ago> There's a distinction to make between Jewish people and Israel. Lots of Jews don't seem to know that.
- DSingularity 1y agoI said Israeli Jews. I didn’t say Jews.
- jhanschoo 1y agoGive me a MSM source that claims that student protesters on a UC campus targeted American Jews on campus with their "rage". For this, I do not regard instances where American Jews feel unsafe or threatened to fall under this where they felt that way due to having conflated anti-Israel sentiment with antisemitism, or because of having their own identity enmeshed with modern Israel. (I do not consider identifying with modern Israel part of being an American Jew.)
- zmgsabst 1y agoPreventing Jews from entering the campus and threatening them are not protected by the 1st Amendment — that’s why UCLA settled the lawsuit for millions, because they had a duty to stop those acts. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/29/ucla-lawsuit-settlement-jewish-students https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/29/ucla-lawsuit...
- nulld3v 1y agoAFAIK the protestors blocked everybody and did not discriminate. And they occupied only individual buildings or sections of campus, entry into campus as a whole was not restricted.
- defen 1y agohttps://x.com/SiaKordestani/status/1785397163662745610 https://x.com/SiaKordestani/status/1785397163662745610 Private actors were preventing people from entering a public part of campus unless they signaled their "anti-Israel" bonafides. The school allowed this to continue, therefore they implicitly supported it.
- nulld3v 1y agoNah, the school was just taking the typical "corporate laissez faire" non-position position. It got worse later on when they started expelling the protestors by force. Very disappointing to see a school fighting it's own student body like this.
- guelo 1y agoWhich isn't even true, UCLA came down hard on protesters and they did violate the students 1st amendment rights.