3 ms·
Mark's article misses one key point. If it were a win then he wouldn't need to write a post defending it. A poorly performing stock price matters a great deal.
by jusben1369 14y ago
Mark's article misses one key point. If it were a win then he wouldn't need to write a post defending it.
A poorly performing stock price matters a great deal. It matters in the leverage you have with partners, retaining senior leadership, hiring new employees and overall day to day morale in the office. So maximizing the short term cash ramp has left FB significantly exposed over the next 24 months. YHOO is a fantastic example of what happens if your company suddenly has the aura of "loser" in the Valley. (Hopefully they'll turn that around but jury's still out)
So rather than absolutely maximize the short term gain FB could have found a middle ground that wouldn't make them the punching bag of the media resulting in long term risks to employee morale and retention.
- natrius 14y agoThe problems with "retaining senior leadership, hiring new employees and overall day to day morale in the office" can be fixed by repricing options, which is cheap in respect to the profit Facebook made from their high IPO price. Yahoo isn't considering a loser in the valley because of their stock price. It's because no one in the valley uses their products. That isn't true for Facebook.