3 ms·
I really don't see how GitHub can justify allowing public access to dangling commits. Surely they have a whole army of paying customers demanding proper data d
by londons_explore 1y ago
I really don't see how GitHub can justify allowing public access to dangling commits.
Surely they have a whole army of paying customers demanding proper data deletion ability (required for all kinds of legal reasons - eg. We accidentally committed code we don't have a licence for, or PII of Europeans, etc).
A simple rule saying 'any commit which ever has a refcount of zero will become forever inaccessible unless reuploaded' would do the trick.