3 ms·
Value in the case of school meant how well you mastered the course objectives: that's how much value you produce in a class (so I think we agree there). Learnin
by drusenko 19y ago
Value in the case of school meant how well you mastered the course objectives: that's how much value you produce in a class (so I think we agree there). Learning more is preferable to learning less, but it depends on what the opportunity cost is. It's entirely possible that you have learned enough in that area, and time spent learning in a different area would be better invested.
- staunch 19y agoThere's at least two aspects to learning: depth and pace. Most schools don't let you go much deeper or faster than the class average. An optimal teaching environment would move both of the goal posts ahead of you, so you're never being artificially slowed down. This is exactly why learning by yourself works so well. It's like running by yourself. You can go however far and however fast you want.
- adamdoupe 19y agoWhile I agree with your points, I don't this the running metaphor is appropriate. If you run with someone, you have a natural tendency to compete, thus you are less likely to slack off.
- staunch 19y agoI'm sure the metaphor isn't perfect, but I don't think the competition thing is a problem. Academic competition is a huge motivator for a lot of people too. Being first in your class, getting accepted to a good school, etc. There are definitely pros and cons to doing things alone vs a group.