6 ms·
China has shown the world the way and most countries likes it.
by RegnisGnaw 1y ago
China has shown the world the way and most countries likes it.
- yupyupyups 1y agoNo, people don't like this.
- andrepd 1y agoPeople don't but those with power (i.e. the people who matter) do.
- jeltz 1y agoMost ordinary people don't but they still vote for authoritarian politicians who like it.
- Saline9515 1y agoMost politicians don't support explicitly such measures. This is a technocratic law, result of a weak consensus in the EU. You don't vote for your Homeland Secretary minister. EU PM don't usually campaign for such issues. This is a failure of representative democracy.
- sneak 1y agoA lot of people feel they have nothing to hide and don’t feel strongly one way or the other on privacy, but they do like feeling safe and secure from crime and “bad things”. It’s a dangerous and destructive worldview, because they benefit immensely from the small percentage of society that absolutely does need privacy.
- consp 1y ago> A lot of people feel they have nothing to hide and don’t feel strongly one way or the other on privacy People think that, but once you tell them they will lose their drivers license since they chatted to their spouse about bad eyesight they bark differently. Or shrug it off with "that will never happen to me" and you can start the "and then they came for the [next group], but I did nothing" line of talk. Everyone has something to hide, they might just not know yet what it is but they will when the option to hide it has gone away. There is a reason my country stopped recording religion since 1946 in the citizen records, it was fine to do so decades before.
- est 1y agoChinese ppl don't like this either. It's teleco vendors, ISPs and govn't agencies are advocating this.
- mcdonje 1y agolmao, like every other major power has been a bastion of free speech until China came up. McCarthyism, what? Politkovskaya, who?
- tavavex 1y agoCensorship and killing people who were too "out of line" were staples of human civilization ever since we started figuring out governance. What's unique about China is that it was a pioneer in capturing this new technology and using it to their state's advantage. Never before in human history could you monitor all the things people said to one another, all the money that got exchanged, all data that's uploaded and downloaded, and have automation that ensures that everyone's information is looked at. The internet had become a tool of centralized control, China just was successful at realizing it first.
- LexiMax 1y agoThey seem to be missing a critical piece - for the horrors that China inflicted on its own population, it also become a preeminent world power and pulled millions out of poverty. What seems to be happening elsewhere is an organized robbery of state institutions by politicians and oligarchs, with oppression and censorship used to keep people from pointing out the obvious. Maybe they're not paying attention to the part of that cycle where they start falling out of windows.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- betaby 1y ago> pulled millions out of poverty but firstly the policies of the very same party put millions into poverty and famine
- rockskon 1y agoBecoming a preeminent world power was orthogonal to them instituting mass domestic surveillance, public humiliation, and selective ethnic cleansing.
- LexiMax 1y agoI upvoted you because you bring up a good point and I want to make clear that I'm not excusing their horrendous behavior or trying to imply that the good necessarily requires or even outweighs the bad. I'm merely pointing out that at the very least, there was _some_ upside to go with the downside, at least for a while, and the upside was a planned outcome by its political leadership. I don't think it was always that way, and it's too soon to tell if its current leadership is similarly wise or just coasting off of past successes.
- rockskon 1y agoI was saying their domestic mass surveillance is not directly tied to them becoming a preeminent world power. That their rise could've just as well happened without it.