4 ms·
If the cost exceeds the benefit, that's a reason to not do something.
by HPsquared 1y ago
If the cost exceeds the benefit, that's a reason to not do something.
- hobs 1y agoIf you want to operate at "dominant player in the industry" there's a lot of reasons you have to do stuff that has reasons not to be done, saying "its hard" isn't a good enough excuse if you want to get the lions share of the market.
- HPsquared 1y agoDominant players can also afford to do a lot of things without immediate payoff, e.g. Google, Bell Labs.
- tremon 1y agoBut no one is forcing you to myopically express that benefit as solely "increase shareholder value", that's a choice.
- johnnyanmac 1y agoSomehow I don't think the billion dollar monopoly on video hosting is worried about doing anything more than serving adverts at this point. So let's just enshittify the product until we get broken up or a competitor somehow rises.