7 ms·
> They aren't useless. Otherwise, ChatGPT would have died a long time back Isn’t the entire industry being fuelled by orders of magnitude more VC funding than
by misnome 1y ago
> They aren't useless. Otherwise, ChatGPT would have died a long time back
Isn’t the entire industry being fuelled by orders of magnitude more VC funding than revenue?
- anshumankmr 1y ago>Isn’t the entire industry being fuelled by orders of magnitude more VC funding than revenue? Because people want to use it, right? And it is a matter of time before they start limiting the ChatGPT "free" or "logged out" accounts, I feel. In the consumer AI chat apps, it is still the dominant brand, at least in my anecdotal experience, and they will basically make the Plus version the one version of the app to definitely use. Plus they are planning on selling it to enterprises, and at least a couple of them are signing up for sure.
- johnisgood 1y agoI think they are already limiting / nerfing "free" vs "logged out" vs "paid" vs "non-commercial".
- arthens 1y agoIsn't that an argument against the sustainability of the LLM business model rather than their usefulness? People use them because they are useful, not because they are VC funded.
- skydhash 1y agoWhen the product is free, that put the barrier at ground level. I have more confidence in Kagi userbase, than OpenAI’s.