4 ms·
The author is undermining their own point by calling the vibe code "maintainable", when the whole point of the post is that it's not.
by thenoblesunfish 1y ago
The author is undermining their own point by calling the vibe code "maintainable", when the whole point of the post is that it's not.
- manmal 1y agoThe main gripe seems to be duplication of semantics across the codebase, and loss of centralized configurability. Makes sense, since LLMs can’t fit a whole codebase into their context and are not aware of shared behavior unless you tell them it exists.