5 ms·

Because it's YouTube kids. Not YouTube YT kids uses a separate app, with a different UI. It's branded as YouTube Kids. And once your kid hits a certain age, th

Because it's YouTube kids. Not YouTube YT kids uses a separate app, with a different UI. It's branded as YouTube Kids. And once your kid hits a certain age, they do not want to be on the kids version. Another approach... Is to mark their kids account as a kids account or something, and have that just be on the regular YouTube website and app. Or what every parent really wants. To whitelist content your kid can watch like in YT Kids. But also include blacklisting shorts. The more this looks like regular YouTube. The better your chances of your kid not just signing out of the app. Or using a web browser with a logged out account to circumvent it. You have to give some illusion in order to maintain the control.

modeless 1y ago
> And once your kid hits a certain age, they do not want to be on the kids version. Who's in charge here, you or your kids? Sure, maybe you could imagine a teen YouTube product you might like more, but you can't say the whitelist feature doesn't exist. It's there and it works.
- shakna 1y ago
  > Who's in charge here, you or your kids? As a parent you're not in charge of a teenager. You're there to guide them, and try to protect them from their bad choices, but they have reached a point where they are beginning to control their self-determinism. They're not a kid anymore. If you just try to act the authority, try to control everything, then well... You'll either end up in abusive land, or trying to control someone who has learnt to hate you for not treating them as a person who does have their own sense of self.
  - abduhl 1y ago
    You are, in fact, in charge of your teenager as a parent. They are, in fact, still a kid. Controlling your kid’s access to things which you deem harmful is, in fact, not abusive. Setting appropriate boundaries does not, in fact, mean you are not treating your kid as a person who has their own sense of self. Most kids will not, in fact, hate you for setting boundaries and being their parent. It is quite impressive that nearly everything you’ve typed is incorrect.
    - shakna 1y ago
      They're no longer a child. That is why they have a different nomenclature - teenager. They are not "a kid". Treating an adolescent as a child is damaging to their mental state [0]. I already said boundaries are a thing: You are there to guide them. But you are not there... To control them. Because doing so, is damaging. And as a parent, damaging your family is both heinous, and a crime. To put it another way: The law sets boundaries on how you can drive. This guides you, to keep you and others safe. It does not however enforce control over you. Your choices are still your own. A parent aims to guide an adolescent, who is no longer a child. [0] https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002003.htm https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002003.htm
      - modeless 1y ago
        This is an argument for not applying parental controls to YouTube for teenagers, while the guy I was replying to is explicitly asking for parental controls for YouTube for teenagers. I think "teenager" is too broad to have a productive discussion here. Maybe we can agree that sometime between 13 and 19 you should definitely stop trying to impose parental controls on your kids.
    - exe34 1y ago
      You when your kids reach 18: "why do my kids not talk to me anymore? oh woe is me, what have I ever done wrong!"
      - johnnyanmac 1y ago
        If you're lucky. That means they have a good moral compass and figured out that you were the anchor on their lives. I'm especially worried about the point where parents are accompanying college students into their inerviews. Which is an slowly, but alarmingly rising phenomenon.
      - alt227 1y ago
        This is like the swansong of every parent ever lol.
- watwut 1y ago
  Ok, once kids hit certain age, YouTube kids is mostly useless to them. As the most perfectly ok and even educational channels are just not there. Includes channels parent wants to give to the kid. Oh, and if the kid is not English speaking, YouTube kids is a wasteland of nothingness.
Aurornis 1y ago
> Because it's YouTube kids. Not YouTube > YT kids uses a separate app, with a different UI. It's branded as YouTube Kids. And once your kid hits a certain age, they do not want to be on the kids version. This doesn’t sound like a YouTube problem.

modeless 1y ago

> And once your kid hits a certain age, they do not want to be on the kids version. Who's in charge here, you or your kids? Sure, maybe you could imagine a teen YouTube product you might like more, but you can't say the whitelist feature doesn't exist. It's there and it works.

shakna 1y ago
> Who's in charge here, you or your kids? As a parent you're not in charge of a teenager. You're there to guide them, and try to protect them from their bad choices, but they have reached a point where they are beginning to control their self-determinism. They're not a kid anymore. If you just try to act the authority, try to control everything, then well... You'll either end up in abusive land, or trying to control someone who has learnt to hate you for not treating them as a person who does have their own sense of self.
- abduhl 1y ago
  You are, in fact, in charge of your teenager as a parent. They are, in fact, still a kid. Controlling your kid’s access to things which you deem harmful is, in fact, not abusive. Setting appropriate boundaries does not, in fact, mean you are not treating your kid as a person who has their own sense of self. Most kids will not, in fact, hate you for setting boundaries and being their parent. It is quite impressive that nearly everything you’ve typed is incorrect.
  - shakna 1y ago
    They're no longer a child. That is why they have a different nomenclature - teenager. They are not "a kid". Treating an adolescent as a child is damaging to their mental state [0]. I already said boundaries are a thing: You are there to guide them. But you are not there... To control them. Because doing so, is damaging. And as a parent, damaging your family is both heinous, and a crime. To put it another way: The law sets boundaries on how you can drive. This guides you, to keep you and others safe. It does not however enforce control over you. Your choices are still your own. A parent aims to guide an adolescent, who is no longer a child. [0] https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002003.htm https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002003.htm
    - modeless 1y ago
      This is an argument for not applying parental controls to YouTube for teenagers, while the guy I was replying to is explicitly asking for parental controls for YouTube for teenagers. I think "teenager" is too broad to have a productive discussion here. Maybe we can agree that sometime between 13 and 19 you should definitely stop trying to impose parental controls on your kids.
  - exe34 1y ago
    You when your kids reach 18: "why do my kids not talk to me anymore? oh woe is me, what have I ever done wrong!"
    - johnnyanmac 1y ago
      If you're lucky. That means they have a good moral compass and figured out that you were the anchor on their lives. I'm especially worried about the point where parents are accompanying college students into their inerviews. Which is an slowly, but alarmingly rising phenomenon.
    - alt227 1y ago
      This is like the swansong of every parent ever lol.
watwut 1y ago
Ok, once kids hit certain age, YouTube kids is mostly useless to them. As the most perfectly ok and even educational channels are just not there. Includes channels parent wants to give to the kid. Oh, and if the kid is not English speaking, YouTube kids is a wasteland of nothingness.

Aurornis 1y ago

> Because it's YouTube kids. Not YouTube > YT kids uses a separate app, with a different UI. It's branded as YouTube Kids. And once your kid hits a certain age, they do not want to be on the kids version. This doesn’t sound like a YouTube problem.