Even selling them at a loss would save more money than destroying them entirely, especially when there are indeed organizations willing to cover the costs to ta

Even selling them at a loss would save more money than destroying them entirely, especially when there are indeed organizations willing to cover the costs to take them off the US government's hands: > An organization called MSI Reproductive Choices said it and other funding partners had offered to pay for the shipping and repackaging of the USAID-branded supplies, but that the US government turned down the offer.