3 ms·
Nifty, thanks for sharing. :) Also, as others have mentioned, there are plenty of options out there, so it might be useful highlight any specific difference o
by wamatt 14y ago
Nifty, thanks for sharing. :)
Also, as others have mentioned, there are plenty of options out there, so it might be useful highlight any specific difference or advantage this solution provides over LabJS, RequireJS, Yepnope, curl.js etc
On a side note, there is a rather comprehensive feature matrix of a number of popular JS loaders https://spreadsheets.google.com/lv?key=tDdcrv9wNQRCNCRCflWxhYQ https://spreadsheets.google.com/lv?key=tDdcrv9wNQRCNCRCflWxh...
- niftylettuce 14y agoEDIT: put the repo back up to not cause broken link here... and added a notice to keep people from starring it i (originally) took the repo down b/c so many people starred it and i didnt want them to be scarred :) never saw that spreadsheet b4, thx for posting. a lot of good discussion in this thread. the project was just a little hack rewrite, i never stated anywhere it was better than anything else and you guys can see why :) feedback is great. i did run some tests on it and it is surprisingly almost as fast/faster +/- as similar solutions though! haha.
- wamatt 14y agoGiven that you probably didn't know about many existing solutions, it's rather great you wrote your own, after realizing a need :) I'd keep the repo up! (even if the feedback is a bit daunting)
- niftylettuce 14y agodone, put a notice on the repo though