3 ms·
We're talking about 8-year-olds here not 15-year-olds, and a website intended for passive consumption, not active participation. I would say the circumstances
by spicyusername 1y ago
We're talking about 8-year-olds here not 15-year-olds, and a website intended for passive consumption, not active participation.
I would say the circumstances are pretty different.
- soulofmischief 1y agoWhen I was 8, I was already hacking around net nanny software and involved in several online communities operated by other children, I was learning how to program and hack and generally use the internet as a gateway into culture that I otherwise never would have experienced. I tried involving myself in a lot of communities related to my interests, but some sites were just for entertainment and not active participation, or I simply didn't participate in the community. That doesn't change anything. Now a software engineer and artist, my entire life was shaped by that time, and as I said, I likely would have committed suicide due to my abusive situation if it wasn't for these communities. I will always fight to provide that kind of environment for others and not pull up the ladder now that I've climbed up.
- squigz 1y ago8 year olds having unmonitored access to the Internet doesn't seem to me to be the fault of the platforms, the government, or me.