3 ms·
They can already access 3blue1brown[1] content without youtube. They just have to visit the site with the same name. 1. https://www.3blue1brown.com/#lessons ht
by kelseyfrog 1y ago
They can already access 3blue1brown[1] content without youtube. They just have to visit the site with the same name.
1. https://www.3blue1brown.com/#lessons https://www.3blue1brown.com/#lessons
- qualeed 1y agoThat is not the only channel of value on YouTube. Not all of them have a website with their content available.
- kelseyfrog 1y agoCan you spell out the standard plainly?
- qualeed 1y agoThe standard of what?
- kelseyfrog 1y agoThe channels besides 3blue1brown that would reach parity.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- angry_moose 1y agoThose are just page after page of embedded YouTube videos. It's doubtful that's a meaningful difference under this bill.
- kelseyfrog 1y agoWhat are you talking about? You can click on any of the lessons and get text and images. https://www.3blue1brown.com/lessons/essence-of-calculus https://www.3blue1brown.com/lessons/essence-of-calculus
- lanfeust6 1y agoWhich aren't videos. The entire draw is the video format.
- kelseyfrog 1y agoThat seems awfully particular.
- schoen 1y agoGrant Sanderson's mathematical animations and visualizations are famously excellent, though. He developed his own mathematics animation software just for his channel. I wouldn't think of video as preferable to textbooks for math education in general, but for his sort of videos, I might!
- Aurornis 1y agoThe bill only bans them from having accounts. It does not ban them from streaming embedded YouTube videos or even browsing YouTube.com
- giantg2 1y ago"The bill only bans them from having accounts." No, the bill says they must take reasonable steps to prevent underage persons from accessing their services. Arguably, this means embedded videos will need to be restricted just as the regular site will be.