4 ms·
Why does his statement not require more substance? Why do I have to provide it? The burden is the other way around. Blazor's architectural model makes it impos
by whoknowsidont 1y ago
Why does his statement not require more substance? Why do I have to provide it? The burden is the other way around.
Blazor's architectural model makes it impossible to be "performant." It's not even debatable.
What you gain in DevEx you lose substantially in user experience.
- mattgreenrocks 1y agoI'm speaking of static server-side components, thus no JS or WASM. Wouldn't touch any other Blazor mode for a public facing app.
- whoknowsidont 1y agoWhat do you gain from implementing in Blazor at that point?
- zbentley 1y ago> Why do I have to provide it? The burden is the other way around. Well, it sounds like you have an axe to grind, but I didn’t ask to “prove” anything; I was curious to learn what was meant by the bad-performance claim. I don’t program in any of these technologies; I don’t have a horse in this race. Let’s try this again: > Blazor's architectural model makes it impossible to be "performant." Say more?
- whoknowsidont 1y agoIt sounds like you're just baiting.