4 ms·
I don't think I buy that. It's hard to build a nice web app without JS, but an informational website doesn't need JS to be beautiful.
by 8n4vidtmkvmk 1y ago
I don't think I buy that. It's hard to build a nice web app without JS, but an informational website doesn't need JS to be beautiful.
- zwnow 1y agoThat's why I wrote business. Wikipedia works for ages now.
- woodrowbarlow 1y agocraigslist too! that's a business. definitely an exception, though.
- motorest 1y ago> I don't think I buy that. It's hard to build a nice web app without JS, but an informational website doesn't need JS to be beautiful. It's not that I disagree with the premise, but you should understand that the "informational website" scenario tends to apply only to a subset of a website's requirements. As soon as you stumble upon any need that goes beyond what static HTML can provide, you are faced with the decision to either create tech sprawl and a patchwork of ad-hoc solutions, or you just bite the bullet and onboard a framework that handles all your needs.