3 ms·
That stability existed due to half of the population (women) not having the option to attain high paying jobs.
by lotsofpulp 1y ago
That stability existed due to half of the population (women) not having the option to attain high paying jobs.
- 8200_unit 1y agoWhile it's true that women's professional opportunities were limited in the past, I disagree that this was the sole or even primary reason for single-income stability. My grandparents' generation, for example, often saw one parent (usually the father) working a manufacturing or union job that paid enough to cover a mortgage, raise several children, and afford basics, even with the mother not working outside the home. The purchasing power of those wages was simply far greater.
- clove 1y agoNow they don't have the option to be housewives unless they actively seek out a rich husband. Who benefits? (There is only one correct answer): 1. Families. 2. Women. 3. Corporations.
- lotsofpulp 1y agoWomen who wanted financial freedom so that they have negotiating power benefited.
- BobaFloutist 1y agoNot having the option of being a housewife is a low cost for having the option to be literally anything but a housewife.
- Tadpole9181 1y agoThe workforce saw an explosion of productivity, and women added upwards of 100% more members of the workforce. The problem is that all of that wealth went to the billionaires and the rest of us got the bones in the scrap pile. Now we can't even raise our children because we need to work, but we cannot even not raise our children because it costs more than we make.
- e40 1y agoLet’s now t forget about the large population of black Americans who were left out, too.
- HumblyTossed 1y agoThat's kinda still the case. The half below the median can't all magically find jobs above the median. Though talking heads would lead people to believe that's true.