3 ms·

Scanned the article twice and it wasn't until I read the source that I saw that it was a shell script. That is the headline feature IMO (rather than 'standard'

by nikcub 14y ago

Scanned the article twice and it wasn't until I read the source that I saw that it was a shell script. That is the headline feature IMO (rather than 'standard') edit: I should add that what gave me the impression of this being an application rather than something I would really use was the way it was presented with 'install', makefiles etc. rather than 'here are 30 lines of bash you can dump into your rc file'

zx2c4 14y ago
Cool! Hmm yea - maybe I should highlight that it's just a shell script somewhere. I already say " It is a very short and simple shell script. " in the first paragraph. Maybe I should say something else too. Thinking... Edit: responding to your edit: Yea, there's a lot of cruft that gets added to a source directory when you try and make anything on Linux into something suitable for /usr/bin and /usr/share/man. C'est la vie.