4 ms·
I was thinking like that before, however now I think it's overkill. Millisecond timestamps are hard to read, they are stored as "bigint" in Postgres, which make
by TheRoque 1y ago
I was thinking like that before, however now I think it's overkill. Millisecond timestamps are hard to read, they are stored as "bigint" in Postgres, which makes it sometimes annoying. What I prefer now is to use the date object, but remember that it's only UTC (and the machine where the code runs should be in UTC time too). It goes well with Postgres Timestamp+TZ field, and it's much more readable.