3 ms·
>It would be useful to know what industry I've found this not to be the strongest defining factor. When I moved to the big city as a youngster, I knew I was g
by fuzzfactor 1y ago
>It would be useful to know what industry
I've found this not to be the strongest defining factor.
When I moved to the big city as a youngster, I knew I was going to be seeing more rats race and dogs eat dogs than ever before.
These are two completely different things, but I was not disappointed. Well literally no more disappointed than I already was, it was just more of the same destructive aggression seen among those who prefer less crowded types of jungles.
It's been so many decades overall and every single time when bossy aggression rears its ugly head it has been a poor substitute for sensibility, filling the vacancy left by an extreme lack of natural leadership ability.
The kind you just can't fix.
- chiefalchemist 1y agoBut isnt the effectiveness of leadership style a function of those being led? For example, (NFL) football players. In previous eras the hard nosed coach was expected. As opposed to today’s more soft and cuddly style. I agree there are some baselines. But the #1 universal baseline of leadership is someone is being led.