3 ms·
For individuals: We have a Pro license implemented in our app. Some non-essential features like custom templates or multi-turn chat are gated behind a paid lic
by yujonglee 1y ago
For individuals:
We have a Pro license implemented in our app.
Some non-essential features like custom templates or multi-turn chat are gated behind a paid license. (A custom STT model will also be included soon.) There's still no sign-up required. We use keygen.sh to generate offline-verifiable license keys. Currently, it's priced at $179/year.
For business:
If they want to self-host some kind of admin server with integrations, access control, and SSO, we plan to sell a business license.
- teiferer 1y agoDoes that mean the admin server is not open source?
- yujonglee 1y agono. it is open source. https://github.com/fastrepl/hyprnote/tree/main/apps/admin https://github.com/fastrepl/hyprnote/tree/main/apps/admin
- thedevilslawyer 1y agoAnother sso.tax candidate. Let's actively not support software that chooses anti-security.
- johntopia 1y agototally fair concern. we’re actually on the same side when it comes to promoting good security practices like SSO. the reason we’re gating the admin server under a business license is less about profiting off sso and more about drawing a line between individual and organizational use. it includes a bunch of enterprise-specific features (sso, access control, integrations, ...) that typically require more support and maintenance. that said, the core app is fully open-source and always will be - so individuals and teams who don’t need the admin layer can still use it freely and privately, without compromising security. we’ll keep listening and evolving the model - after all, we're still very early and flexible. appreciate the pushback. (edit: added some more words to reinforce our flexibility)
- ctxc 1y agoFair stance. I believe sso tax is a necessary evil.
- thedevilslawyer 1y agoNothing fair about making software insecure. Don't normalise it.