4 ms·
"Why CI/CD Still Doesn't Include Continuous Documentation?" (current title) is an interesting direct translation mistake, in the question form. I see it often,
by quesera 1y ago
"Why CI/CD Still Doesn't Include Continuous Documentation?" (current title) is an interesting direct translation mistake, in the question form. I see it often, and it makes sense.
English doesn't have a succinct way to frame the construct. I wonder if this form will eventually become correct.
Alternatives:
"Why (still) doesn't X do Y?"
"Why is it that X still doesn't do Y?"
"Why doesn't X do Y, still?"
All of these are awkward, but more idiomatic. Currently, at least. :)
- pirates 1y ago“Why doesn’t X do Y yet?”
- cbarrick 1y agoNothing about the title seems like an English grammatical mistake to me. In fact, that's how I would say it. Seems like "still" is an adverb modifying "doesn't". Replacing it with another adverb, like "clearly", in the same position also sounds correct to me. I am a native American English speaker. I grew up in Georgia/North Carolina, if that is a useful data point.