4 ms·

Seen here: https://mathstodon.xyz/@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk/114937485114995934 https://mathstodon.xyz/@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk/1149374... Usage conti

• riedel 1y ago
  What are the actual security concerns when using OMEMO mentioned in the post? Most criticism I find is on implementations.
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
  • digianarchist 1y ago
    https://omemo.top/ https://omemo.top/ Wish there were more library implementations that clients could leverage.
  • DoctorOW 1y ago
    Saw this linked elsewhere: https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/ https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/
    • xmpp-enjoyer 1y ago
      For balance, see OMEMO Author Tim Henkes' response [1] to the blog, which was moderated. This is linked from this blog post [2] where the author explains that they prefer XMPP, because it is not a silo. [1] https://www.moparisthebest.com/tim-henkes-omemo-response.txt https://www.moparisthebest.com/tim-henkes-omemo-response.txt [2] https://www.moparisthebest.com/against-silos-signal/ https://www.moparisthebest.com/against-silos-signal/
      • devrandoom 1y ago
        That was a good read. The furry blog post read like a smear campaign. Extraordinary unprofessional.
• rpdillon 1y ago
  That post, describing why we shouldn't be using a OMEMO, is almost incoherent. It doesn't outline any problem with the implementation at all. Every criticism is a metacriticism of some sort. Very strange.