3 ms·
>But Alsup split a very fine hair. In the same ruling, he found that Anthropic’s wholesale downloading and storage of millions of pirated books — via infamous “
by x______________ 1y ago
>But Alsup split a very fine hair. In the same ruling, he found that Anthropic’s wholesale downloading and storage of millions of pirated books — via infamous “pirate libraries” like LibGen and PiLiMi — was not covered by fair use at all. In other words: training on lawfully acquired books is one thing, but stockpiling a central library of stolen copies is classic copyright infringement.
I am not actively following this trend but didn't Meta do the exact same and successfully argued that it was fair use because.. they didn't seed or upload any data?
What am I missing here?
- EMIRELADERO 1y agoYou're not missing anything. The Anthropic and Meta judges simply disagreed with each other and issued two opposite holdings.
- x______________ 1y agoThank you. Will keep in watching to see how this unfolds..