3 ms·
"People who disagree with me about a railway company merger cannot possibly be reasonable, and instead must be mustache-twirling villains" is certainly an inter
by pc86 1y ago
"People who disagree with me about a railway company merger cannot possibly be reasonable, and instead must be mustache-twirling villains" is certainly an interesting take. Good luck with that.
- bigbadfeline 1y ago> "People who disagree with me about a railway company merger cannot possibly be reasonable, So according to you, I somehow stated that disagreement with me makes somebody unreasonable, and in support of that you provided... a fictional quote. Your strawman isn't simply unreasonable, it's aggressively dishonest. > "and instead must be mustache-twirling villains" is certainly an interesting take. Now you offer hallucinations about "mustache-twirling villains"... Do you have something, anything, reasonable to say? Like address the topic? $85 Billion with a B? Did you forget about it? Peaceful disagreement DOES NOT make an argument reasonable. Are you going to argue about that too?
- pc86 1y ago> > There are reasonable people who think this merge would be good > No there aren't You did state that disagreement makes you unreasonable.
- bigbadfeline 1y ago> You did state that disagreement makes you unreasonable. No, I didn't, and there's no such claim in the words you so selectively quoted. Outside of that, I used the specific facts of the case to show that it's unreasonable to call the merge good.