> Just as the developer who refused to adopt version control, IDEs, or Stack Overflow eventually became unemployable This passage forces me to concluse that th

> Just as the developer who refused to adopt version control, IDEs, or Stack Overflow eventually became unemployable This passage forces me to concluse that this comment is sarcasm. Neither IDEs nor the use of Stack Overflow is anywhere near a requirement for being a professional programmer. Surely you realize there are people out there who are happily employed while still using stock Vim or Emacs? Surely you realize there are people out there who solve problems simply by reading the docs and thinking deeply rather than asking SO? The usage of LLM assistance will not become a requirement for employment, at least not for talented programmers. A company gating on the use of LLMs would be preposterously self-defeating.