4 ms·
Lol, I think making confident claims in either direction is total copium at this point. It's abundantly obvious that LLM-based tools are useful, it's just a que
by bubblyworld 1y ago
Lol, I think making confident claims in either direction is total copium at this point. It's abundantly obvious that LLM-based tools are useful, it's just a question of what we'll settle on using them for and to what degree.
Nobody knows how this will play out yet. Reality does not care about your feelings, unfortunately.
- theshrike79 1y agoJust completely ignoring LLMs is like not wanting to use autocomplete or language servers, preferring to hand-craft everything. But on the other hand there is the other end who think AGI coming in a few months and LLMs are omniscient knowledge machines. There is a sweet spot in the middle.
- chuckadams 1y agoThere's certainly room for debate, but I've taken to just ignoring the people who proclaim that AI is merely a passing fad or a useless parlor trick. I can't predict much, but I can confidently say I won't be the only one ignoring them.
- NoGravitas 1y agoFor me, the sweet spot seems to be "keep an eye on LLM developments, but don't waste work time trying to use them yet".
- bubblyworld 1y agoYeah, that makes sense to me for a lot of reasons. Recently decide to take the plunge and start introducing AI tools in my startup. Fairly cheap experiment, all things considered - three months of giving it a try as a team and then we'll make a call. Time will tell!
- theshrike79 1y agoI'd suggest using LLMs as "Autocomplete on steroids" and see how that goes. If online models aren't your thing twinny.dev + ollama will make it fully local.