4 ms·
Wikimedia hosts what UK puritans consider pornographic content. A lot of it. Often in high quality and with a permissible license. I would link to relevant me
by lysace 1y ago
Wikimedia hosts what UK puritans consider pornographic content.
A lot of it. Often in high quality and with a permissible license.
I would link to relevant meta pages but I want to be able travel through LHR.
- miohtama 1y agoA kid can go to Wikipedia and read https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex
- Symbiote 1y agoThey can also go to the library and read the encyclopedia.
- mrweasel 1y agoTo be fair, Wikimedia/Wikipedia also hosts a full copy of "Debbie Does Dallas" does to a fluke of copyright. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Does_Dallas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Does_Dallas
- lysace 1y agoI don’t think we disagree.
- topranks 1y agoI do kind of wonder if it benefits Wikipedia for them to allow so much on commons. I get it’s hard to distinguish between pornography and something that might have educational merit at the edges, and have a workable policy. But still I can’t help but think this is not really helping.
- tmtvl 1y agoMusea of fine arts also host what puritans could consider 'pornographic content'. I believe 'Birth of Venus' is the standard go-to example.