3 ms·
> they actually do not or cannot present any tangible argument against Firefox. They just shit talk about Firefox, and hand-wave their criticism with inane comm
by figmert 1y ago
> they actually do not or cannot present any tangible argument against Firefox. They just shit talk about Firefox, and hand-wave their criticism with inane comments like "they lost the boat".
Have you seen that Mozilla has basically become an ad agency?
- darkwater 1y agoSo, like Google, the makers of Chrome?
- motorest 1y ago> Have you seen that Mozilla has basically become an ad agency? Even taking these comments at face value, this blend of arguments is pretty stupid given that you're making this sort of claims about Firefox when discussing not using Chrome.
- figmert 1y agoTo be clear, I do use Firefox and haven't even installed Chrome/Chromium for a long time. But given that Mozilla is inching closer and closer towards ad agency, it's only a matter of time that Firefox will open up the same issues that Chrome has. The argument of Firefox vs Chrome is not siloed and inherently includes the argument of what their respective developers do and don't do. If we didn't need to include them in the face of such an argument, there would be little reason to switch away Chrome.
- sswezey 1y agoGoogle _is_ an ad agency
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]