>Why do we need a framework for understanding their social implications? I would guess that the argument for wanting a framework for understanding language mod

>Why do we need a framework for understanding their social implications? I would guess that the argument for wanting a framework for understanding language models’ social implications would be the social implications of language models. Like a phenomenon existing is a valid argument for understanding it. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/chatgpt-ai-self-mutilation-satanism/683649/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/chatg... https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/ https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spi... https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/urban-survival/202507/the-emerging-problem-of-ai-psychosis https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/urban-survival/20250... >not everyone is chronically online Do you have data to support this? What does “chronically” mean and why would its absence invalidate the idea of social media impacting how people act and vote?