4 ms·
The reality is the opposite of this post. LLMs are great at rapidly creating rough drafts, and humans are best (when properly trained) at critiquing LLM results
by spoaceman7777 1y ago
The reality is the opposite of this post. LLMs are great at rapidly creating rough drafts, and humans are best (when properly trained) at critiquing LLM results.
So, LLMs are in fact better at blue-teaming, and humans are better at red-teaming.
- abalaji 1y agoI think this flips at the frontier which may be what Tao is commenting on.
- cubefox 1y agoTao is a) unusually intelligent and b) an expert in his field. Most people are neither very intelligent nor have expert knowledge in any academic subject. So Tao is pretty much the least representative LLM user possible.
- auggierose 1y agoYou could argue that Tao is the most representative LLM user possible, because why would you need not very intelligent people use LLMs? Just replace them with LLMs.
- cubefox 1y agoI assume you wouldn't want to be replaced by an LLM.
- auggierose 1y agoFor the paid job I am currently doing, I wouldn't mind being replaced by an LLM at all. Just give me the money, no strings attached. I mean, THAT IS WHAT TECHNOLOGY IS SUPPOSED TO BE THERE FOR. Nobody wants a job, everybody just wants to live their lives.
- ozgrakkurt 1y agoThey are better at everything tbh