3 ms·
Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but it seems like Anthropic has quietly 4x'd the real cost of the Pro plan. There are 168 hours in a week, and if I'm able t
by aliljet 1y ago
Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but it seems like Anthropic has quietly 4x'd the real cost of the Pro plan. There are 168 hours in a week, and if I'm able to (safely) bet on 40 hours of use, realistically, I just lost 75% of the value of the plan.
What are the reasonable local alternatives? 128 GB of ram, reasonably-newish-proc, 12 GB of vram? I'm okay waitign for my machine to burn away on LLM experiments I'm running, but I don't want to simply stop my work and wake up at 3 AM to start working again..
- kmac_ 1y agoPro is just a paid demo. I hit the limit all the time on a small project, and I'm not even doing anything weird. The product is still great, though. At work, we checked out a bunch of options, and almost everyone chose something different, so the competition is though.
- bananapub 1y ago> Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but it seems like Anthropic has quietly 4x'd the real cost of the Pro plan. There are 168 hours in a week, and if I'm able to (safely) bet on 40 hours of use, realistically, I just lost 75% of the value of the plan. I think you're just confused about what the Pro plan was, it never included being used for 168 hours/week, and was extremely clear that it was limited. > What are the reasonable local alternatives? 128 GB of ram, reasonably-newish-proc, 12 GB of vram? I'm okay waitign for my machine to burn away on LLM experiments I'm running, but I don't want to simply stop my work and wake up at 3 AM to start working again.. a $10k mac mini with 192GB of vram with any model you can download still isn't close to Claude Sonnet.
- lavezzi 1y agonot really true per https://artificialanalysis.ai/?intelligence-tab=coding https://artificialanalysis.ai/?intelligence-tab=coding