3 ms·
Tried it with a few prompts. The vibes feel super weird to me, in a way that I don't know how to describe. I'm not sure if it's just that I'm so used to Gemini
by TheAceOfHearts 1y ago
Tried it with a few prompts. The vibes feel super weird to me, in a way that I don't know how to describe. I'm not sure if it's just that I'm so used to Gemini 2.5 Pro and the other US models. Subjectively, it doesn't feel very smart.
I asked it to analyze a recent painting I made and found the response uninspired. Although at least the feedback that it provided was notably distinct from what I could get from the US models, which tends to be pretty same-y when I ask them to analyze and critique my paintings.
Another subjective test, I asked it to generate the lyrics for a song based on a specific topic, and none of the options that it gave me were any good.
Finally, I tried describing some design ideas for a website and it gave me something that looks basically the same as what other models have given me. If you get into a sufficiently niche design space all the models seem to output things that pretty much all look the same.
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoI mean, from what I've heard this is good for coding as the name suggests, I mean I don't know but these models are hyper optimized for coding and using them for other things will result in inferior results imo Maybe try qwen 235 a32 or some other model for general purpose since imo glm is focused on coding. The last task seems interesting, and yes maybe all of these are kinda the same in that aspect so idk. I won't lie but I like the simonw pelican's test by the full glm 4.5 as compared to the air. It looks decent imo.
- jadbox 1y agoFrom my tests, GLM tends to be best for server code or frontend logic. It's not very good at design tasks. It did make a killer chess app with UX, but I think it was just trained heavily for it.