I think there is validity in debating the metrics by which a culture should be measured, but ultimately I think that the greater good is served by allowing each

I think there is validity in debating the metrics by which a culture should be measured, but ultimately I think that the greater good is served by allowing each culture to determine its own path. This maximises diversity of approaches to problem solving and philosophy, things which are far from solved problems for humanity. This is not saying that cultures shouldn’t evolve, adapt, and embrace changing environments, but rather that it is probably a disservice to humanity for one culture to informatically infiltrate and destroy another without an appropriate contest that would establish a hierarchy of fitness. Even then, what kind of fitness? What is a fair contest? Etc etc etc. Best just to let it be, and let them work out their best way forward.