the challenge with getting institutions to sign health information or other data and attributes is users will fight and haggle to get their medical information

the challenge with getting institutions to sign health information or other data and attributes is users will fight and haggle to get their medical information signed the way they fight to get insurance payments today. you're an institution, someone gives you some data to sign for the integrity of, what else do you want from them to hold that risk? everything basically. these protocols push coordination problems to the edge, which sounds great, except they treat all the complexity as an externality. If you're a user and you want a flexible secure wallet to hold these data attributes you can put anywhere you want, I've got an unbreakable bitcoin wallet app to sell you and it comes with a bridge in new york. As described, the SOlid protocol appears predicated on these two counterfactuals. the purpose of cryptogrphic data integrity for digital identity is to absolve any person or institution of accountability for their decision to use it.