3 ms·
No need for the random snark? I mean, again, we're in extremely obvious territory here. Just doesn't seem appropriate for hacker news front-page (to me).
by bubblyworld 1y ago
No need for the random snark? I mean, again, we're in extremely obvious territory here. Just doesn't seem appropriate for hacker news front-page (to me).
- brabel 1y agoYou don’t get to decide that, the people voting on HN do, they did and they disagree with you, just accept you can’t agree with a large set of people all the time.
- bubblyworld 1y agoAbsolutely, everybody gets their say here.
- fragmede 1y agoWhat makes their random snark any better than your original comment though? There was no need for you to come in and say that you don't see any value here. If you don't see any value here, just move on to the next post.
- bubblyworld 1y agoI mean, I'm curious why this is such a highly upvoted article, which is why I'm engaging with this comment thread. I think criticism of the article is fine (although I acknowledge I could have been less blunt). It's the unnecessary criticism of my character that I object to.
- computerdork 1y agoHmm, was only mildly snarky in my opinion
- bubblyworld 1y agoI agree, but my ego is incredibly fragile sometimes.
- computerdork 1y agogood of you to notice, but yeah, in my opinion, you kind of overreacted. All good though:)