4 ms·
Responsible: <link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css" media="print" onload="this.media='all'"> <noscri
by chrismorgan 1y ago
Responsible:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css" media="print" onload="this.media='all'">
<noscript><link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css"></noscript>
This is deliberate FOUC. Why, I have no notion whatsoever. It should read:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css">
- porridgeraisin 1y agoYeah. Maybe they separated critical and non-critical CSS? and delayed non-critical CSS, that way you'll see a degraded version of the page on slow connections. Can't think of any other reason why you would do this.
- arclight_ 1y agoIIRC I followed the advice of PageSpeed or another Google page to do it that way. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Appreciate the feedback!